You are hereHome / Blast blasphemy
Blast blasphemy
Irish atheists are set to challenge the new blasphemy law in court, if necessary. It's going to be interesting.
If I were to tell you that I sincerely believe that my invisible, all-seeing, everywhere-at-once friend (the one who takes a benign interest in everything I do) is real, would you believe me? Maybe you would, but maybe you wouldn’t believe he or she is real, only that I believe he or she is real. You might humour me, for the sake of a friendship or a quiet life, as long as this imaginary friend didn’t start interfering in your life. When I say “interfering”, of course an imaginary friend can’t do anything, but I might try to interfere in your life because (as I might tell you, for your own good) I care about you, and my imaginary friend would like to be your friend too, if you could believe in him, her or it.
You might think I was bonkers if this imaginary friend started dictating my behaviour. Lonely children have imaginary friends, but they usually grow out of them. If adults have invisible friends like Chief Sitting Bull, the spirit guide who attends séances, you might think that there’s some trickery involved – there’s usually a fee for séances. If adults hear voices, it’s usually because they’re mentally ill, and with the right medication, the voices are hushed. Most people who have an imaginary friend never actually hear or see him, her or it. Other people, the enlightened ones with the fancy dress, will tell them about this invisible deity:
Immortal, invisible, God only wise
In light inaccessible hid from our eyes,
Most blessèd, most glorious, the Ancient of Days,
Almighty, victorious, thy great Name we praise.
“God only wise”? Sounds like Walter Smith had trouble getting his hymn to rhyme.
Praising’s fine, as long as I’m not expected to join in. It’s when people start making threats I get cross. For example, in the Bible it says:
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me (Luke, 19:27).
That’s not nice, is it? The Qur’an is full of similar threats, such as:
As for the unbelievers, neither their riches nor their children will in the least save them from God's judgment. They shall become fuel for the Fire (3:10).
As an unbeliever, I’m not in the slightest bit worried about “the Fire”, but I do worry about the increasing number of zealots who are keen to slay people like me. Recently, in conversation with a couple of religious friends, I said, “Either you believe or you don’t,” and they said it wasn’t as simple as that; doubt is, apparently, experienced by many of the faithful. Maybe that’s one of the reasons why so many zealots are so keen to ban blasphemy – they don’t want any doubters, dithering on the brink, to see that poking fun at religion or being rude about it isn’t any worse than poking fun at politicians, or being rude about anyone with a tendency to make absurd pronouncements. God does nothing to unbelievers - no lightening strikes, or anything. It's just God's self-appointed enforcers who do the nasty stuff - the maiming and the slaying.
If you have to defend your opinions and ideas with the force of law, even with capital punishment, are they really worth defending? Surely, if you’re confident that you’re right, it shouldn’t matter what anyone says about what you believe. You may feel annoyed, you may be angry, but, as my mum used to tell me, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names may never hurt me.” Words are just words. Challenge them with more words. Don’t seek to punish people you disagree with. What matters is what people do, not what they say. I don't much care for the sort of things that a lot of religious people do, like spending my taxes.
What does "blasphemy" mean, anyway? It's "irreverent talk about God or sacred things". That covers a lot, doesn't it? What does "irreverent" mean? It means "disrespectful", and that means "lack of respect or courtesy". It's all so vague. What it boils down to is anything that a sensitive religious person doesn't like, or anything that upsets him or her. Some people are easily upset, so, again, the notion of blasphemy covers a lot. It really doesn't make sense to have a law that involves punishing people for upsetting other people. I get quite upset about being told I shall go to hell because I don't believe in a sky fairy, not because I believe there is such a place, but because the people who tell me this clearly think I'm worthless.
So, Irish Atheists, if you don't win the fight to scrap the stupid law they've brought in over there, so soon after we got rid of blasphemy on this side of the Irish Sea, the old jokes about stupid Irishmen will come back to haunt you. And if the Islamic States who want to make the defamation of religion a crime at UN level succeed, we'll all be in big trouble.
It only seems right to end with a bit of blasphemy:
So you’re gonna live in paradise,
With a ten-foot cock and a few hundred virgins,
So you’re gonna sacrifice your life,
For a shot at the greener grass,
And when the Lord comes down with his shiny rod of judgment,
He’s gonna kick my heathen ass.
Tim Minchin, Ten-foot Cock and a Few Hundred Virgins, 2005
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Subscribe using RSS
Very good post to start the year Margaret. I enjoyed that.
I thoroughly agree with Quedula, a fantastic way to see us into 2010.
Now where did I put that big, slippery rod of judgement....
The older I get, the less I feel inclined to be polite to idiots.
It was interesting to see in the news this morning that a Somali had tried to murder Kurt Westergaard, of Danish cartoons fame. Maybe I'll need a panic room soon.
The whole issue of sensitivity-as-power is a worrying trend, and something I'm writing on at the moment, but what intrigues me the most in your article is the issue of the 'doubters.'
I'm trying to find an analogy which makes sense in my own life, and it's proving difficult. The closest I can find is this: suspecting that the many photos around the house of your never-met-because-he-lives-overseas, fabulously war-heroic yet philanthropic father are actually of a total stranger, and your father was a sperm-donor who died young.
If I were in that position and knew it to absolutely true, then to try to maintain the fiction would be an act of insanity. In this scenario, though, I can see that I would want to try to continue believing it because I have no proof either way - just a logic that says it's unlikely.
And, of course, in this scenario it would mean that death was just death and there was no afterlife (and no 10-foot cock and no virgins...), so maybe desperately to try to maintain the Daddy-fiction is preferable.
All in all, I'm glad I've never believed. It's not a great position, but at least I've had 48 years to come to terms with it.
Penny, it's interesting that you should write, "It's not a great position" about your unbelief. I'm not sure I understand.
Many of the people who choose humanist funerals for their relatives will say that they're not religious, they don't believe, yet make comments that suggest that they hanker after an afterlife. They don't like the finality of death. I understand that this is something that many recognise as irrational, yet still can't shake it off. I suppose that fear of death is a natural human feeling, and maybe the fear is one of the things that prompts us to try to avoid risking death in many situations. However, the notion of an afterlife is, to me, totally abhorrent. I've written about it elsewhere.
Ah, poorly worded, sorry! I simply mean that I'm the product of millions of years of evolution and have the survival instinct that results from it.
It's nature's little joke to give us the intellect to see our own demise, to see that the houses we build will outlast us. Much as I'm not impressed with these people's vision of an afterlife, I'm not exactly embracing the alternative.
I'm not sure one can talk about rationality on this topic: the fact that we're here at all - collectively and individually - is a little crazy. And to expect us to spend our lives hanging determinedly on to it, and yet to relinquish it with easy acceptance at the end...well....
So, as I say, not a great position, but I've had 48 years to come to terms with it.
Excellent comment by Philip Hensher: "None of us likes being insulted, but only a priest seeks to pass a law against it."